Wednesday, August 20, 2008

theories of entanglement

I dont believe that Earth beings were meant to spend their lives
staring at computer screens
meant to have cell phones attached to their corporal control ships
meant to have headphones eroding their earbuds
meant to communicate via text message shorthands
people grow fatter as the holographic world becomes more accessible
with the click clack of a keyboard and rub of a mouse
we dont step outside anymore to feel the breeze
to watch the moon crash down to the earth
hypnotized by the virtual voodoo
half our lives lived on the line, projecting our holograms
morphing into avatars
being sucked into the black hole of cyberspace
when the stars await us right above us
we sit beneath them, losing ourself between the 0s and 1s
technology has devolved humanity into beings categorically deaf dumb blinder
who no longer see know nor hear the evil
it seems to me to be a part of some global scheme of disconnection
with a powerful mental manipulation component that makes us believe that
we are more inter-netted, part of one earthwide web
yet i feel so alone in this seat
in front of this screen
click clacking at this keyboard
hoping to reach or be reached
for these letters of mine to be eaten
through reverse electronic voyeurism

and i need to get a grip, because i find that
half the time
when i write, i post. i blog.
my thoughts, originating in my head, become crafted inside of this box, unleashed unto the public..

I make my writing palatable to the public, like a chef, and like a photographer, I consider the collective eye of the outside viewer.

Not to be misconstrued - sharing alone, is never a bad thing, desirable, perhaps, to incite dialogue and thought and inspiration and movement, for the creation of culture and for the representation of common experience. Art, some believe, is created to be shared, to communicate, to exchange vision and sound and taste, to give temporary, imperfect access to the innerworkings of another.
We can argue the point and purpose of art until the second coming of the big bang, its purpose is elusive.

But I have my own take on it.
Me, I believe that art is by nature, selfish, perhaps only in the first instance;
I believe, the photographer takes pictures first and foremost from angles appeasing to her eye, that the chef must first taste his own cooking and be satisfied

because creativity, it comes from self, from places that outsiders have no access to, it is an emptying of the bowels - - while its end product, its manifestation, may be for distribution to others, I think that it is, or should be, first created for one's self, as expression, as a release, before it is handed over to the world, where it will there be broken down, re-interpreted, absorbed, distorted - transformed into something tangible or taste-able or visual or audible or sniff-able and all around palatable to the tastes of others

I must nurture my art, whatever it may be, for art's sake, and stop making it so fucking palatable for the pleasure of others (for now), stop feeding it to a growing culture of television and electronic voyeurism that I despise, decry.
I must rid myself of this arrogance, (I possess it, dont I, merely for the fact that I believe that, what I consider to be my art, made digestable to the other, may have the power to transform, to move, to reform, to supplement a perspective) .

Not that a bit of arrogance for the purpose of art is neccesarily unwarranted, evil, but thats just not where I want to be with it right now, I havent earned arrogance. Not that I dont need affirmation either. Oh, I do, certainly. But affirmation directly from self needs to be further developed, for me, which translates into, I need to nurture my confidence and my perception, not neccesarily my ego, the ego that is gained from other's perceptions of my art.

Art for art's sake, not art for distribution.
not yet, man.
i have stories to tell, though.
characters to breathe life into, worlds to spin into orbit.
i cannot keep them within me
they pound at my skull at night, begging for release.

Monday, August 11, 2008

summer reading list

The Philosophy of Space & Time - Hans Reichenbach

Synchronicity: An Acausaul Connecting Principle - Carl Jung

Fanhreinheit 451 - Ray Bradbury

3 To the Highest Power

Behold a Pale Horse - William Cooper

Universe 10...

Seeing Double - Peter Pesic

Dangerous Visions

Saturday, August 9, 2008

sound travel

I was doing some survey the other day that prompted the taker to make a soundtrack to what would be a movie of their life. it had me thinking how crazy it is that music can act as a time machine, a vehicle by which one can be transported back to a certain place or event or moment (or whatever other space/time vocab) so efficiently and completely, allowing your mind to reconstruct everything from the images seen to the feelings coarsing through your body at some pinpointed moment. Music is interweaved throughout the fabric of events that make up our lives. What lies in a note, a string of notes, a person's voice, melodies and sounds, glued together to make a song, that has the power to embed itself into your soul? there's heavy energy in the sound, some sort of voodoo. I even hear it in my sleep. Funny how that brain groove/mind/memory thing collaborates...

Particularly, if you are an avid music listener, if your mp3 functions as a second heartbeat, life truly does have its own background music, perpetual motion picture soundtrack type of thing. For myself, I get hooked onto certain songs for weeks or months at a time, and will play that set of songs or that artist incesstantly until I get tired of it. When I become unhooked and maybe go to play that song or songs I was previously addicted to on a later date, this whole portion of some segment or episode of my life will overtake my senses immediately with a heavy wave of nostalgia, causing me to fall into a deep reminisce. its strange stuff.

i think i'm going to perfect a method of time travel one day. i need to get to work.

Monday, August 4, 2008

just some initial thoughts/processing.

"Natural laws are statistical truths, which means that they are completely valid only when we are dealing with macrophysical quantities." - Jung

The Earth science, the laws and rules and mathematics we use are based upon non-global/non-universal agreed upon concepts in our observations of the physical. it is a "chaotic collection of curiosities," an almagamation of a billion different sets of eyes, a billion perspectives. The ultimate paradox is time, and I am trying to devour as much research as I can so that I may crack the code. I've been conducting mini-thought experiments here and there, testing the boundaries and opening portals - with some rather interesting results, things I havent quite processed completely yet, out of fear. These experiments come with consequences, one of them being that you can never return to back to comfortable ignorance once youve seen. I dont even want to write about it - I dont want anyone to think I'm off my rocker. One day. Or perhaps I'll wrap up the truth up inside a science-fictional blanket. This much I can express - linear cause and effect are a fiction, one of those agreed-upon truth-lies that we've adopted. there is definitely a three-fold co-existence of present, past, and future, and in thought-experiments, I've experience time as slices stitched together with distinct, separable events interweaved into the next event - something slower than a nano-second of time, that it was almost outside of time... there's more, but again, at the risk of sounding lunatic, i'll present it in a different medium.

the way i see it - the future is not neccesarily written, just because its affecting the past or the present or vice verse, however. the three just co-exist like a 3-number combination on a fancy lock, and you can always change a variable, you always have a choice, out of infinite choices, of how this "future" will play out.